Being Soaked in One-sided Knowledge and Totally Ignorant of the Other Side of It - (8)

네이버 영어 사전 안내



The law of Trinity cannot be proved by 

science which has been destined to deal with

only the nature of the Nature, being totally 

blind to the Supernature, the other side of 

the Coin(the whole creation) concerned. 


Astronomer Robert Jastrow states, "The scientist has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak, as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries."  http://www.bibleandscience.com/science/godexists.htm

From www.bibleandscience.com Breaking News

FAMED ATHEIST PHILOSOPHER, ANTONY FLEW, NOW BELIEVES IN GOD
In my college class in philosophy, Antony Flew was required reading. His writings tempted me to doubt the very existence of God. So I was shocked to learn that he now believes in God. Interview with him at Atheist Becomes Theist. See also Sorry, says atheist-in-chief, I do believe in God after all  and Famous Atheist Now Believes in God.

Arguments for God

1. The Design or Teleological Argument.
   
   We see much design in the world. Something designed points to a designer. The universe is very fined tuned for life. This could not be by accident but design. This is the number one reason why people say they believe in God.
   
   British physicist Paul Davies writes in his book Superforce, "The laws [of physics] ...seem themselves to be the product of exceedingly ingenious design...The universe must have a purpose." In his book The Cosmic Blueprint he states, "[I see] powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all. The impression of design is overwhelming."
   
   Hugh Ross has some excellent books pointing out how fine tuned the universe is for life. His web site is Reasons to Believe.
   
2. Primer Mover Argument
   The world is in motion. Someone must have started the motion. This is similar to the next argument.
   
3. First Cause Argument
   The world has cause and effect sequences. There must be an efficient first cause for everything in the world.
   Since the discovery of the expansion of the universe, Scientists realize the universe had a beginning. How did the beginning begin? Some astronomers turned to God. Astronomer Robert Jastrow states, "The scientist has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak, as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries."
   
4. The Perfection or Ontological argument. If there is something good and true, there must be something truest or perfect from which everything comes which must be God.
5. The Moral argument. Humans know right from wrong. Animals do not. Where does this morality come from, God.
6. The miracles argument. Miracles show there must be a God.
7. The experience argument. I have experienced God's power, he must exist. Similar to this is the next one.
8. The consoling argument. I believe because it makes me feel better.

Pascel's Wager Argument

If we bet there is no God, and there is we lose everything. If we bet there is a God, and there is a God we have everything to gain. Even if there is no God, we lose nothing. Better saved then sorry.

Paley's Watchmaker Argument

If someone walking through the woods finds a watch, he does not say it evolved by chance. One sees it has design therefore there must be a designer. Has anyone seen this designer? No! Yet we know there is a designer. So too, we do not see God, yet we do see the wonderful design of his creation.

See Is There Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God? How the Recent Discoveries Support a Designed Universe by Dr. Bradley.

 http://www.bibleandscience.com/science/godexists.htm



"Verily I say unto you, that the scientists and atheists go into the kingdom of God before you the theologians"

Those who "preached any other gospel...than that which we have preached unto you"(Gl 1:8,9) were not atheists. Without  warning the churches "to work out your own salvation with fear and trembling"(Php 2:12), no preacher would be in Paul-line. They are near to "be accursed"(Gl 1:8). They are the "grievous wolves"(Ac 20:29) and "fase prophets in sheep's clothing"(Mt 7:15), if they don't preach as Paul did as he warned; "Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife. But and if thou marry, thou hast not sinned; and if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned. Nevertheless such shall have trouble in the flesh: but I spare you. But this I say, brethren, the time is short: it remaineth, that both they that have wives be as though they had none; And they that weep, as though they wept not; and they that rejoice, as though they rejoiced not; and they that buy, as though they possessed not; And they that use this world, as not abusing it: for the fashion of this world passeth away. But I would have you without carefulness. He that is unmarried careth for the things that belong to the Lord, how he may please the Lord: But he that is married careth for the things that are of the world, how he may please his wife. There is difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman careth for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit: but she that is married careth for the things of the world, how she may please her husband. And this I speak for your own profit; not that I may cast a snare upon you, but for that which is comely, and that ye may attend upon the Lord without distraction"(1Co 7:27-36).